Grey Wolves

The grey wolf has between 5 and 24 subspecies that is recognized in North America and 7 to 12 are recognized in Eurasia, with 1 recognized in Africa.

Grey wolves once used to roam all over North America, but by the mid 1930’s, they were killed off in most areas of the United States. Today, their range has been reduced to Alaska, Canada, Pacific Northwest, the Great Lakes and Northern Rockies. With a historic range of over two-thirds of the United States, they now only occupy less than 10% of that range.

Today, grey wolves have populations in Alaska, northern Michigan, northern Wisconsin, western Montana, northern Idaho, northeast Oregon, and the Yellowstone area of Wyoming. Mexican wolves, a subspecies of the grey wolf, were reintroduced to protected parkland in eastern Arizona and southwest New Mexico.

Because of natural migration from Canada, reintroduction to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho, there are now more wolves in the northern Rockies and some are now moving into the West Coast states, including California.

In the western Great Lakes region, the grey wolf population grew to around 4,500. In the northern Rockies the population is around 1,766 wolves. The Pacific northwest has around 250 wolves and Alaska has 7,700 to 11,200 wolves. There is 114 mexican grey wolves in the southwest recovery area (southwest New Mexico, east Arizona). And in North Carolina there are 24 known red wolves.

Grey wolves hunt mainly at night, especially when the weather is warm and in areas populated by humans. Being carnivores, wolves eat large hoofed mammals such as elk, deer, moose, bison and caribou. Grey wolves also hunt smaller mammals such as beaver, rabbits, hares, and other small prey. Wolves in western Canada even fish for Pacific salmon. A large amount of prey that wolves hunt are young, old, or in poor condition.

Because of folklore, mythology and tall tales, the grey wolf has had an impact on humans and are now victims of misunderstandings that few other animals have shared. After the arrival of European settlers, the wolf has been viewed as an evil creature, a danger to humans, a competitor for big animals and a threat to livestock. Depredation of livestock was the main justification for hunting wolves from virtually all of the United States, Mexico and even most Europe.

Despite what media and people say, wolves are only responsible to around 0.02% of all livestock losses. Data is self-reported by ranchers and farmers to the National Agricultural Statistic Services (NASS), which releases public reports every few years. The reports show that 95% of livestock losses are due to disease, dehydration, starvation, respiratory infections, birthing complications, bad weather and ingestion of poisonous weeds and plants; not to do with any sort of predators.

Of the small amount of losses due with predators, wolves are on the very bottom of the list. Surprisingly, domestic dogs cause far more losses than wolves do. Science shows that killing wolves to prevent conflicts can do the opposite of the intended effect – chances are it can result in more conflict, shift the problem to other ranchers and farmers, and it can result in decreased social tolerance by people to coexist with wolves.

Google search for Grey Wolves: From Petition Site

The Role That Wolves Play

In my last blog post I did a short summary of the ‘War on Wolves’. I went over a few key points of what has happened starting from 2011 to now.

In this post I will be covering what role wolves play and how they affect the environment and ecosystem.

Due to research, it has been proven that wolves in particular contribute to the overall function and stability of the landscape. Wolves prey on large, hoofed mammals such as deer, moose and elk. By using the diseased, young, old, weak and injured as prey, wolves keep prey populations in good health.

When deer and elk become overly abundant for their environment, they overgraze on vegetation, which leads to potential damage to other native wildlife and degradation of their habitat.

The red wolf in particular plays a big role in southeastern United States. Historically, red wolves roamed from southeastern Texas to central Pennsylvania. But due to the eradication of the wolf population, they are now mainly only found, in the wild, in eastern North Carolina’s Albemarle Peninsula.

With the elimination of red wolves, the coyote and raccoon population grew, and in turn, the wild turkey population shrunk. With the growth of the coyote population, the abundance of small predators, such as foxes, grew smaller. And without foxes preying on smaller mammals that are responsible for infecting ticks with Lyme disease, the chances of incidence and range for the disease increases.

With how grey wolves primarily prey on hoofed mammals that graze on vegetation, they help shape the environment in which they live. Because there is no overgrazing, it increases the populations of countless species from birds of prey to pronghorn, and even trout and different types of fish. And as proven with Yellowstone National Park, wolves played a huge role in not only reshaping the rivers, but also reviving many plants and trees that fell victim to overgrazing.  

There are multiple other roles that wolves play in the environment, and it’s not only red and grey wolves. It has been proven time and time again that wolves are important for the environment and ecosystem. They help parks and forests flourish with fauna and native wildlife.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started